Antisocial Parking is No Different than Child Rape

A person has been parked in a no parking zone for over a day. The space is clearly marked and as a "no parking zone" there's absolutely no reason to believe that one should have and right to park there. Regardless, it's been over a day.

What? Should this person be fined? Towed? No. This person just needs to permanently exist where everybody else refuses to follow basic prosocial norms and behavioral cues due to self-righteousness.

The reason why people don't shit on the street is because agreed upon social norm and everybody agrees that, despite all inconvenience, they will find a toilet and shit in the toilet rather than shit on the street. The gall it takes to see a sign that says "Don't shit on the street", then boldly shit directly in front of this sign is what it takes to park in a "no parking zone". Clearly, you're being told to refrain from doing something, but despite this, you choose to disregard this suggestion anyways, for whatever reason.

The issue is not one of "crime" or "problems", the problem is one that setting the precedent of ignoring prosocial norms is somehow acceptable. The entire basis of law, is at its root, nothing more than a mutual agreement to respect prosocial norms, and when people such as this parking infidel choose to disregard social norms, the only viable solution is to ensure that this person exists in a world where all prosocial norms, including all laws, are boldly disregarded.

In such a situation, any suggestions unto prosocial behavior, including laws, must always be disregarded by all parties, simply to help people understand that 99% of the world follows the suggestions of the social cues requesting us to uphold prosocial norms for a reason. It's just a shitty fucking place otherwise.

It’s Literally Rape

Putting your car in the zone when the zone says "No", is logically identical to putting your penis in somebody when they say "No", and that's literally rape. The fact that the person chooses to park in this space demonstrates that this person has the same mental capacity for antisocial criminal behavior as an unapologetic and deliberate rapist.

The reason why we have such problems with endless criminality and problematic, self-righteous, antisocial behavior in our society is because people like this are allowed to walk the face of this Earth without facing a tit-for-tat public execution by endless crimes committed by sarcastic criminals as justified by their wanton disregard for the de facto law of prosocial norms.

The problem is not the "act" or whether "the punishment fits the crime", the problem is that the mentality exists in the first place. Allowing people to normalize even this "minor disregard" for prosocial norms in turn serves to justify further deviance from these norms by other people who will, in their own self-righteousness, justify these further antisocial acts upon the previous antisocial acts they have witnessed and will invariably use as a precedent which justifies their own behavior.

Criminality is not a metric which can be understood with measurements such as property damage or lost value, criminality is a psychological state which enables the individual to disregard prosocial norms when self-righteousness compels them to seek personal gain at the expense of others.

Regardless of whether the act is parking when the spot says "no" or brutally raping a child when the child screams "no", the willingness to act contrary to prosocial suggestions is a marker of a person defined by a criminal and antisocial psychology, which, if left to fester, will produce the same influence on the world as any other criminal, regardless of their actions, regardless of the situation they are in, because it is this mentality alone which ensures that the person will behave in an antisocial manner and produce endless blight upon society.

Antisocial actions are detrimental to society regardless of whether they are criminal or not. Antisocial actions compel somebody to take the path of least resistance which can solely be attained by disregarding the welfare of others while asserting one's own personal entitlement to benefit at the expense of others. It is this mentality alone that ensures the antisocial people will produce detriment to society in any situation they exist within, regardless of whether their actions are deemed "criminal" by the current legal system.

These people fail to understand that the only reason they can "get away with" and benefit from committing these antisocial acts is because 99% of people are voluntarily choosing not to commit these acts. If the rest of society were committing these acts, then the antisocial person would not have any benevolent people to abuse with their self-righteousness, the streets would be too covered with shit to even think about shitting there, and every no parking zone would be filled to the brim. This is the type of society such people must be forced to experience for their own psychological flaws, because this is the only way they can possibly comprehend the folly of their ways sufficiently enough to avoid doing such things.

Prosocial Norms are the Basis of Civilization

Civilization itself solely exists because the vast majority of members historically chose to act in prosocial ways. It was through the combined efforts of 99% of people in society to abide by agreed upon prosocial norms, as well as the agreed culling of antisocial humans from this civilization that allowed civilization to arise. This is what allowed buildings to exist without being on fire, this is what allowed money to exist without endless robbery, this is what allowed streets to exist without being covered in shit.

Tragically, the only way our ancestors attained this result was by killing antisocial people until these problems stopped, but unfortunately, that is an art which is lost to modern men.

When an antisocial person voluntarily chooses to spit in the face of the far better prosocial humans, to voluntarily disregard prosocial norms in the name of self-righteousness, this is truly the only justification you need to exile this person from prosocial society and condemn them to exist until death among a society that is solely comprised of antisocial people. This person choosing to park in the “no parking” zone must invariably be parked-in to the space, just to help them understand why there are prosocial norms related to parking of cars.

When a person has demonstrated the psychological capacity to act in an antisocial way, this evidences a behavior pattern which will indefinitely and invariably continue until the person is either jailed or killed. Tolerating "small things" does nothing but ensure a death by 1,000 cuts for the rest of society, and that's one of the major justifications for any sort of championing of degeneracy that I may engage in.

I can defend the child rapists, the men who rape children when the children cry "no", because the degenerates of the world park in the parking spaces when the space clearly says "no". It is by this precedent that I can justify the destruction of civilization in the name of tolerating that which antagonizes it, because this is exactly the world the people want, this is what the people demand when they expect to benefit from antisocial actions.

It doesn't matter if you're tolerating a gram or a kilogram of antisocial behavior, because you're either going to die from being crushed by 5 kilograms or 5,000 grams, and there's no sane argument which can meaningfully distinguish between 5,000 grams and 5 kilograms. When one individual gram is tolerated, this means 1,000 individual grams are tolerated, and this is no different than tolerating a kilogram. The grams in this case representing the severity of antisocial behavior.

Seeing the antagonists of civilization accepted as if they are "just as acceptable" as the 99% of society which voluntarily remains prosocial, regardless of how "petty" the offences may be, demonstrates the fact that the allegedly "prosocial" people of this civilization are nothing more than AIDS incarnate, in that they refuse to antagonize that which any healthy society would antagonize, which is in this case, all forms of antisocial behavior.

The problem of Westerners drawing a line in the sand over what is or isn't acceptable leads to things such as the endless littering problem and problems like this antisocial parking terrorist. These people go unpunished, and when exposed to shitty people, other humans are far less compelled to abide by prosocial norms, since they now know they are being abused and taken advantage of by the antisocial miscreants who choose to disregard the very basis of civility in the name of animalistic self-righteousness.

The problem is not the act itself, but the defense of these people for "minor" issues, the indifference to these problems, is an indifference to humanity abandoning civility and instead embracing animalistic self-righteousness. It is this self-righteousness that justifies a man's indifference to civilization when he shoots up heroin and shits on the street. It is this self-righteousness that justifies a rapist when he brutally abuses a woman in order for him to attain what he wants and is currently denied.

When people are, for whatever reason, led to believe that minor antisocial acts are acceptable, this is just the point where all defense of civility must be abandoned outright and each existent individual must produce the greatest amount of antisocial disregard for prosocial norms as possible.

When a man is talking too loudly at a restaurant, clearly the rational decision is for everybody in the restaurant to surround him and start yelling as loud as possible to demonstrate to him the folly of his ways. These people always fail to understand that the benefit they attain through antisocial actions can only be attained when 99% of society chooses not to attempt to attain that benefit.

This failure to understand is evidence of a lack of mental capacity, but regardless, when they are presented with a situation where everybody else chooses to break the social norms they initially chose not to follow, only then can they possibly understand exactly why it is everybody else chooses to follow these social norms.