Antisocial Parking is No Different than Child Rape

A person has been parked in a no parking zone for over a day. The space is clearly marked and as a "no parking zone" there's absolutely no reason to believe that one should have and right to park there. Regardless, it's been over a day.

What? Should this person be fined? Towed? No. This person just needs to permanently exist where everybody else refuses to follow basic prosocial norms and behavioral cues due to self-righteousness.

The reason why people don't shit on the street is because agreed upon social norm and everybody agrees that, despite all inconvenience, they will find a toilet and shit in the toilet rather than shit on the street. The gall it takes to see a sign that says "Don't shit on the street", then boldly shit directly in front of this sign is what it takes to park in a "no parking zone". Clearly, you're being told to refrain from doing something, but despite this, you choose to disregard this suggestion anyways, for whatever reason.

The issue is not one of "crime" or "problems", the problem is one that setting the precedent of ignoring prosocial norms is somehow acceptable. The entire basis of law, is at its root, nothing more than a mutual agreement to respect prosocial norms, and when people such as this parking infidel choose to disregard social norms, the only viable solution is to ensure that this person exists in a world where all prosocial norms, including all laws, are boldly disregarded.

In such a situation, any suggestions unto prosocial behavior, including laws, must always be disregarded by all parties, simply to help people understand that 99% of the world follows the suggestions of the social cues requesting us to uphold prosocial norms for a reason. It's just a shitty fucking place otherwise.

It’s Literally Rape

Putting your car in the zone when the zone says "No", is logically identical to putting your penis in somebody when they say "No", and that's literally rape. The fact that the person chooses to park in this space demonstrates that this person has the same mental capacity for antisocial criminal behavior as an unapologetic and deliberate rapist.

The reason why we have such problems with endless criminality and problematic, self-righteous, antisocial behavior in our society is because people like this are allowed to walk the face of this Earth without facing a tit-for-tat public execution by endless crimes committed by sarcastic criminals as justified by their wanton disregard for the de facto law of prosocial norms.

The problem is not the "act" or whether "the punishment fits the crime", the problem is that the mentality exists in the first place. Allowing people to normalize even this "minor disregard" for prosocial norms in turn serves to justify further deviance from these norms by other people who will, in their own self-righteousness, justify these further antisocial acts upon the previous antisocial acts they have witnessed and will invariably use as a precedent which justifies their own behavior.

Criminality is not a metric which can be understood with measurements such as property damage or lost value, criminality is a psychological state which enables the individual to disregard prosocial norms when self-righteousness compels them to seek personal gain at the expense of others.

Regardless of whether the act is parking when the spot says "no" or brutally raping a child when the child screams "no", the willingness to act contrary to prosocial suggestions is a marker of a person defined by a criminal and antisocial psychology, which, if left to fester, will produce the same influence on the world as any other criminal, regardless of their actions, regardless of the situation they are in, because it is this mentality alone which ensures that the person will behave in an antisocial manner and produce endless blight upon society.

Antisocial actions are detrimental to society regardless of whether they are criminal or not. Antisocial actions compel somebody to take the path of least resistance which can solely be attained by disregarding the welfare of others while asserting one's own personal entitlement to benefit at the expense of others. It is this mentality alone that ensures the antisocial people will produce detriment to society in any situation they exist within, regardless of whether their actions are deemed "criminal" by the current legal system.

These people fail to understand that the only reason they can "get away with" and benefit from committing these antisocial acts is because 99% of people are voluntarily choosing not to commit these acts. If the rest of society were committing these acts, then the antisocial person would not have any benevolent people to abuse with their self-righteousness, the streets would be too covered with shit to even think about shitting there, and every no parking zone would be filled to the brim. This is the type of society such people must be forced to experience for their own psychological flaws, because this is the only way they can possibly comprehend the folly of their ways sufficiently enough to avoid doing such things.

Prosocial Norms are the Basis of Civilization

Civilization itself solely exists because the vast majority of members historically chose to act in prosocial ways. It was through the combined efforts of 99% of people in society to abide by agreed upon prosocial norms, as well as the agreed culling of antisocial humans from this civilization that allowed civilization to arise. This is what allowed buildings to exist without being on fire, this is what allowed money to exist without endless robbery, this is what allowed streets to exist without being covered in shit.

Tragically, the only way our ancestors attained this result was by killing antisocial people until these problems stopped, but unfortunately, that is an art which is lost to modern men.

When an antisocial person voluntarily chooses to spit in the face of the far better prosocial humans, to voluntarily disregard prosocial norms in the name of self-righteousness, this is truly the only justification you need to exile this person from prosocial society and condemn them to exist until death among a society that is solely comprised of antisocial people. This person choosing to park in the “no parking” zone must invariably be parked-in to the space, just to help them understand why there are prosocial norms related to parking of cars.

When a person has demonstrated the psychological capacity to act in an antisocial way, this evidences a behavior pattern which will indefinitely and invariably continue until the person is either jailed or killed. Tolerating "small things" does nothing but ensure a death by 1,000 cuts for the rest of society, and that's one of the major justifications for any sort of championing of degeneracy that I may engage in.

I can defend the child rapists, the men who rape children when the children cry "no", because the degenerates of the world park in the parking spaces when the space clearly says "no". It is by this precedent that I can justify the destruction of civilization in the name of tolerating that which antagonizes it, because this is exactly the world the people want, this is what the people demand when they expect to benefit from antisocial actions.

It doesn't matter if you're tolerating a gram or a kilogram of antisocial behavior, because you're either going to die from being crushed by 5 kilograms or 5,000 grams, and there's no sane argument which can meaningfully distinguish between 5,000 grams and 5 kilograms. When one individual gram is tolerated, this means 1,000 individual grams are tolerated, and this is no different than tolerating a kilogram. The grams in this case representing the severity of antisocial behavior.

Seeing the antagonists of civilization accepted as if they are "just as acceptable" as the 99% of society which voluntarily remains prosocial, regardless of how "petty" the offences may be, demonstrates the fact that the allegedly "prosocial" people of this civilization are nothing more than AIDS incarnate, in that they refuse to antagonize that which any healthy society would antagonize, which is in this case, all forms of antisocial behavior.

The problem of Westerners drawing a line in the sand over what is or isn't acceptable leads to things such as the endless littering problem and problems like this antisocial parking terrorist. These people go unpunished, and when exposed to shitty people, other humans are far less compelled to abide by prosocial norms, since they now know they are being abused and taken advantage of by the antisocial miscreants who choose to disregard the very basis of civility in the name of animalistic self-righteousness.

The problem is not the act itself, but the defense of these people for "minor" issues, the indifference to these problems, is an indifference to humanity abandoning civility and instead embracing animalistic self-righteousness. It is this self-righteousness that justifies a man's indifference to civilization when he shoots up heroin and shits on the street. It is this self-righteousness that justifies a rapist when he brutally abuses a woman in order for him to attain what he wants and is currently denied.

When people are, for whatever reason, led to believe that minor antisocial acts are acceptable, this is just the point where all defense of civility must be abandoned outright and each existent individual must produce the greatest amount of antisocial disregard for prosocial norms as possible.

When a man is talking too loudly at a restaurant, clearly the rational decision is for everybody in the restaurant to surround him and start yelling as loud as possible to demonstrate to him the folly of his ways. These people always fail to understand that the benefit they attain through antisocial actions can only be attained when 99% of society chooses not to attempt to attain that benefit.

This failure to understand is evidence of a lack of mental capacity, but regardless, when they are presented with a situation where everybody else chooses to break the social norms they initially chose not to follow, only then can they possibly understand exactly why it is everybody else chooses to follow these social norms.

Jewish Treatises by Marzipan Maddox

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gWdpDzLC5d17ScSf0IBqMrWxsXAwMI54/view?usp=sharing

Compiled all of the Medium posts into a PDF. I doubt the book website would want it. I didn't edit it. I claim fair use on this shit and I don't make money off of it.

Medium Finally Banning Me, Supposedly

 

Streets Full of Shit: Why Western Civilization Has The Check Engine Light On

Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash

The streets are covered in shit, and for some reason it seems I’m the only one with a shovel. Everyone else is just shitting in the street and screaming at me when I even suggest that the streets should not be overflowing with human shit.

The guns of the secret police are trained upon me at all times as I walk the streets, the inescapable smell of shit choking me to the point of suicidal ideation out of a lack of other viable alternatives to alleviate this suffering. Were I to even place one shovelful of the most insufferable shit into the long-forgotten sewers, I would immediately be shot and killed by the secret police, and were I to escape, I would be hunted to the ends of the Earth.

Every attempt to communicate with people results in them aggressively shitting on the street, throwing their shit at me, and screaming at me when I suggest that a better life can be attained if we resolve the issue of shit in the street. To the people, their shit is sacred. The detritus of their civilization is more sacred than the civilization itself, and the people would readily allow their civilization to collapse if it meant saving their sacred feces.

It is a peculiar kind of hell to exist here, for whatever vices these people deserve to suffer for are hardly the principal cause of their endless suffering. Their suffering is caused almost entirely by their refusal to distinguish between shit, human detritus, and their own species and civilization.

These people have aggressively policed thought and rhetoric to ensure the swift censorship and execution of anyone who dares argue that shit is somehow different than humans, let alone suggest that shit is worse than humans. It is through this extensive policing process, the culling of all opposition, that every voice in the crowd preaches in unison of the immutable sacred nature of human detritus.

My Plight

Perhaps this is a form of OCD, just like how one might see a bookshelf full of non-alphabetized books and become incredibly bothered. When I walk through the streets and every building and human is smeared head-to-toe with awful smelling shit, this makes me very uncomfortable and unhappy. Perhaps it is a mental illness to believe that civilization should not be defined by its greatness rather than the worship of its detritus.

It is living a life like this which has resulted in a catatonic hopelessness. After failing endlessly when attempting to teach humans to purge the detritus from their society, my attempts are weaker every time, because each time I try and fail, hope diminishes.

I feel such extensive and overpowering pity and shame for this species, I feel powerless to help them, and with little faith that these beasts will ever accept the benefit I offer them, I am forced to watch them scream, cry, and shit on themselves as they die from the cavalcade of diseases that fester within feces and the humans which worship this feces.

I hate myself for wasting my time, for being idle rather than productive, for pursuing an empty existence rather than volunteering to shovel the shit from the streets, but when I look upon the shovel, crippling fear sets into my body.

This is not a fear of the consequences of shoveling this shit, this is not a fear of being hunted and killed, for my life upon this planet is no more meaningful than that of a lost lemon. This is a fear of knowing that regardless of how much I attempt to aid this species, that my efforts will amount to nothing. This is a fear that even if, by some miracle, I could redeem the species and clean all of the shit from the streets, that human nature alone would ensure that the beasts readily degrade back into this subhuman state and begin militantly filling the streets with their shit again.

My fear is one of being powerless to prevent the inescapable fate of the human species endlessly waterboarding itself as the levels of human feces in the streets steadily rise to the nostrils of everyman and begin to diarrhea-board him until he dies a slow, painful, and merciless death, all while he will never once consider the fact that it was his worship of his own feces which led him to exist in this state, and instead attempts to find somebody to blame, all while claiming that the feces itself is the greatest victim of all.

The level of human detritus in the streets has already reached pandemic proportions. The children are already being diarrhea-boarded from birth, with many of them suffering extensive psychological damage such as depression, consumerism, hedonism, humanism, idealism, hypochondria, transgenderism, and a disinterest in life, all of which profoundly increase the risk of suicide and reduce the capacity for sexual reproduction.

Modern children are little more than husks, soulless sacks of meat whose psychological workings have been so thoroughly marred by the deluge of human feces which has festered so long in the electric containment chambers of the internet that it has spilled over into the streets, and as if this were an act of terrorism, the feces is readily assaulting and cannibalizing whatever elements of society it can invade and infect with its dysfunction.

This is an Allegory

Clearly, this is an allegory, rather than legitimate human feces, but in all irony, this situation is much worse than it would be if real human feces were to pollute the streets, as this was commonplace before the advent of indoor plumbing and the world was no worse for wear.

So, what is this “allegorical human feces”? It is you. It is everything that the everyman defends, enjoys, and worships which in no way betters him, but instead makes him weak, worthless, dysfunctional, and problematic. The above list of unfortunate -isms is merely scratching the surface, for the nature of the everyman produces this militant intolerance for everything which would hold him accountable or expect him to work in a way which in any way displeases him, and he, like most beasts, is naturally work-shy and seeks to survive by taking the path of least resistance.

This diagnosis of “human detritus” hold true in every category where philosophy determines the beliefs and actions of the everyman, this is true wherever words for the everyman are peddled, and this is true everywhere any sort of action is expected of the everyman, for if every single one of his faults, flaws, and failures is not aggressively coddled if not worshiped, the everyman will throw a tantrum, forcing every shill and propaganda peddler to pollute any functional peasant shepherding rhetoric with such a profound degree of the worship of human detritus that it becomes impossible to shepherd peasants to accomplish anything beyond smearing their own shit on themselves and society as a whole.

Every philosophy which provides a man something for nothing, every argument which defends the rights of worseness in the face of betterness, all of these standpoints which promote the tolerance of marked worseness and allege that such worseness is “unquestionably equal” to that which is empirically unquestionably better, these are the markers of the philosophy of suicide which has so readily poisoned the everyman due to his own irrational fear of his own potential persecution for his own worseness should any persecution of worseness exist.

“There aren’t people who are worse than other people”,

If you want to say “There aren’t people who are worse than other people”, you are the problem. You’re one of the many people who are worse than other people, and it is the outcry of your people which has broken the everyman to such a state where he lies dying in the street, covered in his own feces, riddled with countless diseases of the mind, body, and soul which can solely be spread through the fecal-oral route that becomes dominant in society once the ne’er-do-wells begin to preach that “feces is equal to food”, at which point, the everyman, born and bred to be compliant, begins to eat his own feces until he dies.

There are two groups of people, the “tolerated” and the “tolerant”, and if you are part of a group of people that must be “tolerated”, then clearly you originally faced persecution due to inferiority or a naturally problematic, conflictory, or detrimental nature. If you were a boon to society, then clearly nobody would have persecuted you in the first place, but instead, now you demand to be “tolerated”.

This is not some slight directed at colored people, homosexuals, or transgender people. White people had been killing each other due to alleged worseness for thousands of years before the advent of these tolerated groups in the West. Even the philosophies of Nazis and religious fundamentalists are nowhere near intolerant enough because these groups extensively tolerate worseness within their own parties, and this is exactly why the dregs of society are so often attracted to these groups. These people simply want the feeling of unconditional protection and a sense of immutable, albeit baseless, self-respect despite being so thoroughly and palpably flawed to the point where the general public openly despises them, either subtly or overtly, much like every other tolerated group in the West.

There are no groups of people which are not “tolerated” groups in the West because there are no groups of people which are free enough from flaws to the point where they can be seen as self-legitimizing independent of the protections of the original tolerators such as human rights and ethics. Even the most successful and intelligent among us are flawed to the point of condemnation due to their cowardice and unwillingness to antagonize worseness, which is morally cardinal sloth, a sin no less grievous than rape or murder.

Legal protections, as “noble” as they might seem, protect worseness 99% of the time, and when you spend 500 years protecting the rights of worse individuals to deoptimize society, you end up with a result as described in this story. You end up with a civilization where shit, the detritus of the human species, floods the streets and there are no longer any legitimate humans alive that will ever clean it up. You end up in a world where the children are diarrhea-boarded by such low-quality humans that the children lose their will to live and reproduce.

Humans do everything they can to draw fallacious distinctions between themselves and the systems they depend upon. Humans will scream if you remind them that humans are mammals, animals, no different than other farm animals and equally as much bound by the same economic and biological principles that bind farm animals.

In the same right, humans will scream if you remind them that civilization is itself a business and is defined by the same economic principles that define a business. In this case, one of the endless business principles that succinctly explains my point is the concept of “tolerance”.

Tolerance at the Human Factory

In the factory, parts are manufactured. Let’s say this factory is manufacturing pistons for engines. There is a tolerance threshold that defines the manufacturing process which explains the amount of error that can exist within the manufactured pistons. This threshold is incredibly small, because even the slightest amount of defect ensures that the pistons don’t function properly when placed in the engine.

In this story, the tolerated people go march upon the piston factory and they say “Increase the tolerance threshold for pistons!”, then they start throwing Molotov cocktails, breaking things, and robbing the cowardly factory workers who give into the demands of the protestors and increase the tolerance threshold for the manufactured pistons.

The factory, now being more tolerant, starts to produce pistons with a wider range of diameters. They keep making pistons, but since the tolerance for error, or “inclusion of diverse pistons”, within piston manufacturing has increased, now a profound amount of these pistons cease to function. Many become so big they cannot even fit inside of the engine, many are so small that when attempted to be used for fuel combustion, the heat escapes around the sides of the piston and no longer force the piston down with enough force to turn the crankshaft.

According to the humanists, according to the ethicists, this catastrophic result is seen as “improvement” because “more pistons are included” and “pistons are given equal rights”, when logically, at this point, the dysfunctional pistons cease to even exist as pistons due to failing to produce the defining result of a piston which is the turning of a crankshaft within an internal combustion engine. These pistons are empirically nothing but waste, garbage, dysfunction, and failure, but according to the metastasizing cancers of philosophy which infest our species, these “pistons” are “just as good as all the other pistons, and it is the fault of the internal combustion engine if the piston is not adequately producing the torque necessary to turn the crankshaft.”

Does it seem like civilization is currently running with the “Check Engine” light on? Because it is. Because this is exactly what happens when you champion tolerance. Civilization is a labor engine, and the terrorist-level antagonization of empiricism by philosophy has produced this incredibly dysfunctional system which is readily leading the species unto its farcical suicide in the name of “tolerance”.

The “Ox-Bothering Test” of Philosophy

This is the problem that I suffer from every day. I watch the human factories pump out these dysfunctionally flawed piston-men, and I watch the engine of society burn itself away as it steadily reaches the point of complete collapse.

I see all of this dysfunction as the product of the psychological detritus of the human species being allowed to exist and pollute the streets and the everyman who is so readily swayed by the savage smells of logical feces that coax his bestial mind into a state of blissfully ignorant and childlike indignation.

The philosophers test their arguments on the minds of oxen, alleging that should the ox be swayed by the philosopher’s rhetoric, then the argument is valid, when in reality the ox has such limited mental capacity that the only empirical truth that can be measured when an ox such as the everyman is exposed to rhetoric is how potent said rhetoric is for agitating the beast and stoking him into a state of unrest.

The same “ox-bothering” status which is used to defend the concepts such as ethicism and humanism are the identical concepts championed by rhetoricians such as Donald Trump. Clearly his rhetoric has a profound ability to rally the everyman, but clearly this does not mean his arguments are in any way empirically legitimate.

The humanists and ethicists of the Enlightenment are no different than Trump in that they produced their “legitimacy” and ultimately their tyranny through the “ox-bothering” test, in that their rhetoric was enough to upset the everyman to the point where he rioted and caused lots of problems.

The rhetoric of these philosophers was no different than Trump, but the West worships the Enlightenment era philosophers for the same reason that the Trump-supporters worship Trump. When the everyman hears his shit-preacher saying “You’re special, you’re important, and you deserve better!”, the bestial everyman starts to holler and stampede because he’s a farm animal with a childlike intellect that is readily convinced that the words of “important guy who talks good” are true simply because the guy is “important and talks good”.

When the literate degenerate philosophers of the Enlightenment made the same Trumpian arguments to rally the people, the results were equally as palpable, and the resulting governments of labor farms being operated by the beasts of burden themselves has resulted in such a state of such terminal dysfunction that the crumbling foundation of the true civilization which preceded the “Enlightened” West can no longer support the extensive shanty-town skyscraper of deoptimization and dysfunction that has been produced by increasing the tolerance for this sort of fallacious pure-rhetoric bullshit like humanism, ethicism, and today, Trumpism.

“Your account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules”

At least cite exactly what is breaking the rules. Remove it. I don’t care. This article alone is evidence enough of my indifference. I’ll just go shitpost somewhere else. It’s not like anyone reads this shit.